| OCR Text |
Show -11- b. History: Rejected (California Exhibit No. 2015, p. 39). 13B. California Exhibit No. 2013B: Bratton amendment to Phipps amendment (California Exhibit No. 2012) (December 10 (calendar day December 11), 1928). a. Limitation provision: Amend the 4,600,000 acre-feet in California Exhibit 2012 to 4,400,000 acre-feet. b. History: Agreed to (California Exhibit No. 2015, p. 53). 13C. California Exhibit No. 2013C: Phipps perfecting amendment to Phipps amendment (California Exhibit No. 2012) (December 12, 1928). a. Limitation provision: Insert in California Exhibit 2012 after "apportioned by" the words "paragraph (a) of article 3 of" (California Exhibit No. 2015, p. 54). b. History: Agreed to as amended (California Exhibit No. 2015, p. 91). 14. California Exhibit No. 2014: Hayden amendment to Phipps amendment (item 12) (December 10 (calendar day, December 11), 1928). a. Limitation provision: Provided for a three-state compact awarding 4,400,000 acre-feet to California, 300,000 acre-feet to Nevada and 2,800,000 acre-feet to Arizona annually of III (a) waters and one-half of the excess or surplus annually to both Arizona and California. |
| Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits. |
