| OCR Text |
Show CALIFORNIA DEFENDANTS Exhibit No. 2006 Identification:.................... Admitted:. J.UL.1.8..1.957 Extract From Debate on H. R. 5773, S. 728, S. J. Res. 164 and H. Res. 208 (Fourth Swing-Johnson Bill), 70th Cong., 1st and 2d Sess. [69 Cong. Rec. 10259-60 (May 28, 1928)] Mr. Pittman. I wish to place in the Record at this point a suggested amendment. It is not to be proposed, because that would be perfectly useless, but it has been suggested. It is in accordance with the conference to which I have just referred and it is designed to carry out that idea at some date. It was largely drawn by Mr. Wilson, the commissioner of New Mexico, in the course of the conference to which I have just referred. It is only to be published in the Record; it is not offered as an amendment. The Presiding Officer. Without objection, the suggested amendment will be printed in the Record. The suggested amendment1 is as follows: Strike out all of lines 1 to 18 [page 5], both inclusive, and insert in lieu thereof the following: "Sec. 4 (a). This act shall not take effect and no authority shall be exercised hereunder, unless and until the States of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and S. 728, Cal. Exh. No. 2001 (footnote supplied). |
| Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits. |
