| OCR Text |
Show -10- first paragraph of section 4(a). California Exhibit No. 2015, p. 54. i (7) For the history of the second paragraph of section 4(a), see item 14. (8) Section 4(a) as it now reads was agreed to on December 12, 1928. California Exhibit No. 2015, p. 91. 13. California Exhibit No. 2013: Bratton amendment to H. R. 5773 (December 7 (calendar day, December 8), 1928). a. Limitation provision: Provided for alternative seven- or six-state ratification and in the latter alternative requiring California to limit her "aggregate annual consumptive use" not to exceed 4,400,000 acre-feet of III (a) waters, 500,000 acre-feet of III(b) waters and one-half of "excess or surplus waters unapportioned" by the Compact. b. History: (1) Amendment intended to be proposed by Senator Bratton; ordered to lie on the table and to be printed on December 7 (calendar day, December 8), 1928. (2) No further action taken. Cf. 12 b (5). 13A. California Exhibit N. 2013A: Hayden amendment to the Phipps amendment (California Exhibit No. 2012) (December 10, (calendar day, December 11), 1928). a. Limitation provision: Amend the 4,600,000 acre-feet in California Exhibit No. 2012 to 4,200,000 acre-feet. |
| Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits. |
