OCR Text |
Show -2- tract on file in the office of the City Clerk as Document No. 281567, between the United States of America and The City of San Diego, dated February 15, 1933, relating to the waters of the Colorado River?" "Proposition No. 2: Shall The City of San Diego transfer and assign to the San Diego County Water Authority the City's rights and obligations under that certain Lease-Contract on file in the office of the City Clerk as Document No. 356879, between the United States of America and The City of San Diego, dated October 17, 1945, granting to the City a lease of the aqueduct being constructed by the United States Navy from San Jacinto Tunnel to San Vicente Reservoir, except the City's obligation under Article 2(a) of said Lease-Contract to construct a water treatment plant and other works as contemplated by the City bond issue approved April 17, 1945, and the obligation under Article 2(c) of said Lease-Contract that the City supply all Government agencies within the area with an adequate supply of water at nondiscriminatory rates, and on condition that if the Authority shall cease to be a portion of the corporate area of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, the said Lease-Contract shall revert to the City, subject to all modifications, defaults or acts of the Authority, affecting the said Lease-Contract ?" (c) The number of votes given in the City for and against each measure, is as follows: On Proposition No. 1 the vote was: For said proposition 77,311 votes Against said proposition 7,309 votes |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits. |