OCR Text |
Show CALIFORNIA DEFENDANTS Exhibit No..... Identification: JBLJL J*7 Admitted INDEX Litigation in the Supreme Court of the United States Pertaining to Parker Dam ( United States v. Arizona ) ( 295 U. S. 174 (1935) ) 1. Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint and Bill of Complaint, pp. 1-18, inclusive. 2. Application for an Order to Show Cause Why a Restraining Order should not issue, pp. 1-8, inclusive (including Affidavit of Elwood Mead). 3. Affidavit of Harold L. Ickes, Secy, of Interior, in Support of Application, pp. 1-10, inclusive. 4. Answer of the State of Arizona, pp. 1-8, inclusive. (In the original Answer, an Appendix entitled: "Cooperative Contract for Construction and Operation of Parker Dam" is attached. This document has been omitted, but the text of this document is set forth in California Answer, Appendix No. 22, p. 316; Wilbur & Ely, Hoover Dam Documents, H. Doc. 717, 80th Cong., 2d Sess., Appendix 1201, 2nd Edition (1948) and is designated as Pre-Trial Item 104.) 5. Return to Rule to Show Cause Why Restraining Order should not issue, pp. 1-3, inclusive, including Affidavit of B. B. Moeur, Governor of Arizona in Opposition to Application for Restraining Order, pp. 1-14, inclusive. 6. The Opinion of The Supreme Court of the United States, pp. 1-11, inclusive. |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits. |