OCR Text |
Show CALIFORNIA DEFENDANTS Exhibit No. 1901 Identification;^ 12 1957 Admitted: INTERROGATORY B-2 OF INTERROGATORIES ADDRESSED TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE STATE OF ARIZONA, BY THE CALIFORNIA DEFENDANTS, SET NO. 1, DATED FEBRUARY 28, 1956; THE ANSWER OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA DATED MARCH 15, 1956, Reference is made to paragraph XXII, pages 25-26, of Arizona's Bill of Complaint: B-2, By what methods does Arizona contend that water can be or has been "salvaged by man" as that term is therein used in subparagraph (a)? Do the methods include storage reservoirs, channelization, elimination of non-economic natural vegetation, storage in underground basins? [Answer by Arizona dated March 15, 1956] B-2. Arizona contends that the methods by which water can be and has been salvaged by man are those described by the Bureau of Reclamation in Report on Water Supply of the Lower Colorado River Basin-Project Planning Report, November 1952, issued by the Bureau of Reclamation. These methods include storage reservoirs, channelization, and elimination of non-economic vegetation; but do not include storage in underground basins. |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits. |