OCR Text |
Show -12- [Journal of the House, pp. 246-247, February 9, 1923.] Without objection at 1:35 o'clock P. M., the House resolved itself into a Committee of the Whole House for the further consideration of the bills on the Calendar, Mr. Mayes in the chair. At 4:30 o'clock P. M., the Committee of the Whole House rose. The Committee of the Whole House submitted the following report: "Mr. Speaker: Your Committee of the Whole House reports that it has had under consideration House Concurrent Resolution No. 1, House Bills Nos. 8, 64, 65, 28 and 69, and respectfully recommends: That House Concurrent Resolution No. 1 be amended by annexing thereto Substitute House Resolution No. 15 and House Resolution No. 16, and as amended, it do pass. That House Bill No. 64 retain its place on the Calendar pending the arrival of a similar bill from the Senate. That House Bill No. 65 be indefinitely postponed. That House Bill No. 28 do pass. That House Bill No. 37 be re-referred to the Committee on Judiciary. That House Bill No. 69 be further amended as follows: In line 21, after the word 'paid' insert the following: 'and said person shall not be permitted to drive or operate an automobile, motor truck, motorcycle, or other motor vehicle for a period of one year from the date of his conviction for said offense. Any person who, after |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits. |