OCR Text |
Show -5- Exhibit No. 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 Iden. Evid. Page No. Page No. Extracts from An Equitable Basis for Solution of the Colorado River Controversy, by G. E. P. Smith, Dec. 15, 1928. (pp. 2, 8, 9) 10,469 Extract from State of California, Department of Public Works, Division of Engineering and Irrigation, Bull. No. 19, Santa Ana Investigation (1928). (p. 103) 10,469 Extract from State of California, Department of Public Works, Division of Water Rights, Bull. No. 7, San Gabriel Investigation, Analysis and Conclusions (1929). (pp. 11, 34-35) 10,469 Extract from State of California, Department of Public Works, Division of Water Resources, Bull. No. 33, Rainfall Penetration and Consumptive Use of Water in Santa Ana River Valley and Coastal Plain (1930). (p. 21) 10,500 Extract from U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Technical Bull. No. 185, Irrigation Requirements of the Arid and Semiarid Lands of the Southwest, by Fortier and Young (1930). (p. 35) Extract from Return Water and Drainage Recovery from Irrigation (Discussion by R. I. Meeker), 94 Transactions of American Society of Civil Engineers, Paper No. 1730 (1930). (pp. 338-39) 10,500 Extract from State of California Dept. of Public Works, Div. of Water Re- 10,439 |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits. |