| OCR Text |
Show 167 Thomas fwored ,he New 0.1 bonking legislation, it which attempted to restore faith in statement Thomas indicotes not property as well, ene on,l" at teast thot part of bonking institutions. In the following support of the New Deal but of the feund.tiGAS of conservative <I concept of though" Out In our State.nd in California we had whctt we called 'School lanking Day', ond every child wos taught tht·ift and was encouraged to put absolute faith iA his Dcmk. It was. right that this should b. done" beeDud Amerh:ens should be taught the war'. of property and. ownership. Then something went wrong. The bonks seemed to go bock on them We do not know whot WQ$ the CClVS., bUf bonks closed, Qft,d f(lith was Iturt. That day has gone, end, through New D_I legblCltion, 0 man when he can get (I dime eon 11 put it wh.re it will be sal•• II Toom. showed the ment same interest in the National Youth Administration in quest for educatton. subsidiaing worthy $hJCien1s Youth Admlnistrotion which WGS one was finally of oU-ou-t aid to ThomQ$ olso ment indicoh,s his five support. 10 11 His support of Noti-cMOI swallowed ln his general educationel education. The limits of hh grounds hove already been suggested wi.th reference to the supported tn. Federal Housing Program. sympathy and repeets the as thinking principle The poUey on theoretical of federalism. following political theory underlying $tQte his le91510- H,e stated: Ibid. p , 4838. Congressional Record, Vol., 80, February 15, 1936). p. 2178, (74th Congress, 2d Se$S., |
