| OCR Text |
Show 91 But when a particular group hQ$ Qlt-ernated to interpret its rights as bell'\g of paramount interest, and the rights of the public, and the rights of the opposing group os merely ,.'on dory interest, and government supports the one group, then we hove had trouble and sometimes governmental and industricd choos and disorder. u36 Perhaps mcue one may find distinction between the thought form of the misuse its pubUQ rights thwGrt the decision of the to and the idea of the 0 Itizen who is is apt to misdirect and misuse Its constitutional arbitrarily impose the misuse of the of both a person who is its will on the minority. public on a rights peculiar right of itself. to an the individuel, Individual seem more group, and to a certain group duol atoms, uses its to protect the groups. They loyotty position, made strong by to secure en advantage over mining majority poliey, the real izotlon Individual member bend his mere the rights secondary pione, is taken loyalty by the What the group protects is the interest of the individual in When the group concerned with thereby place for his protection in his meant and the inter· (lfraid that the minority Thomas would minority rights by Q parti(;ular opposing groups and the more maiority position them that the molarity will Minority rights (Ire individuel rights used The of .raid that the rnaiority will UFSUrp the rights of the' minorIty theln that the minority wHi est Q of whlch membel"$hip, or to 0 group. group to protect belonging a numerous concourse other groups ate to it. of indivi- for the purpose of deter- accrues to then it is the advantage of each unurping minor.ity rights 36 Address, at National Radio Forum, Congressional Record, Vol. 81, (7Sth Congress, 1st Sess., March 27, 1937). 608, p, |
