| OCR Text |
Show 109 Thom. could that wgy. In why see each notion octed two hOfieRS he comparing it os did, whet foctors made would compare the fGets in one it act with the facts in the other and the ideals of one with the ieeals of the other; he would not compare the teal istie facts in one with the ideal tltie ends of the the facts of behavior fall fer short of their Once he undertook to read on article anticipated goob prepored by Q or other, knowing ultimate ends. collaborator but based ideas, the artiele having been sent to him before writer h_ us$(.( aU of the fOJTliliar derisive terms pubUcotion. The Japon had beeome known adJective abusive, to het enemi •• by by which ThomQ$ took his pen, scratched out each cmd substituted another for it, his substitutes being milder terms and less terms leading to po$Sible good-will and not to (.1 creating of iU-will. correlation do_ exist, that the agoinst them in relation to Name-calling foils same names can the focts of their own as be used or .fuming that by the he would in the internal affairs of his break down absolutes, if effront to civilized think ing that we iustify an assault on G man simply beeouse he is Anglo-Saxon, or Teutonic, or Nordic, or what not, according to our notional mood of the moment .13 Yas, we 13loe• cit. must eontinue to is to rule. other notion Thomas wou1d break these He said: good will It is an eaff life. Into the realm of absolute. down in international ,elations they names another nation and the fact. in the domestic life of that nation, (2 his the eollaborotor to be checked Few persona reoHze that little eorrelatiOft exists between the such on own country. |
