| OCR Text |
Show 100 step. I He remarked that it was foolish to make international customary low. We need, he rights and duties of neutrQls In the yet been eMulnted. The logical international action in regard build our Poet. In to exerebs law, and to the we wete out AO only way defining <JCtion to make is tG to attempt bring about international rights Gnd duties, and then demoeroey. the United fStQtes under the Argentin,e Arttl- to assume a or to essume further economic bear in Q diplomatic Q c:ommon means dispute. and or ormed lnter- _Utary attitude, authorized by ,internationol He said that Joint neutral right could be enforced, but that an obvious and reGlIstic .toteme'" that the vociferous pociflsts had What 'WOuld Philippines, ond we action had on American Foreign deliberately overlooke.d or in their sweet and syrupy effusions happen if in South America? war He were on broke out in the Far East, sow dearly !1 Lac. cit. Policy, absolutely peace and near the Caribbeon the Qreas as an i Neutral ity of the United Stat.,·l Congr.sionQI _Iecord, Vol. 80, 2177-2188, (74th Congress, 2d Sess., February 17, 1936). 2 not pi (Ift$. incapable of understanding pp. us the United Stotes to bring public opinion Then he m,ode one these political, Judiciol" of neutrals b the worked for obligations of no cose WCd As neutrals vention. 'Gld, Uintemational domestic low upon those international rights Gnd duties. ,,2 Thomes cited the war domestic law stronger thon light of our treaty ohllg_ions. This has move to Q |
