| OCR Text |
Show ave them 0 political leience textbook representatton. He had failed buil4 persons who could effeetlvy lecture up Oft' front fo, him" on the ortani2otJon explain cold in his ,meetings In and aphere had $hH'ted; son in this Identity itfon with the (I to the Oft h:qd,been in effie.• would hove been vulnerable. He b'l_w hot (.lAd he had net. The ang time. Any per arond the .tote. Times, had chanted; he had ,not. He conttovenial el_tot. Thomes, 'ire-,boll., h_dly, a good 'peeker, was MOre so by his cl.•• , policies of Preside,nh Roosevelt and Trum. Other groups besides the doctors On October and nature of at home mode up of his stands legis.latlon_ and generally ,1nterpret ,him and hi. vIews usually milW-manneredl ver principle opposed Thomas in an organiz.ed f.Mon .. 10, 1950, John N. Selle,Ak, "-ldeAt of the Utah f ..m lur·eou Fe,d., Because Senator EI bert D.. Thomas has oppoted the m(lln and issues outlined by the Amerleon Farm 8ureou Federation he will not be supported by th UtQh Farm aureou In the eomlng election. The reasons ere as '01 lows: 1. The fam Bureau opposes the repeal of the TClft-HGttley and Clegg-Vest laws QS a protection of the public interest principles although recogni:dng tthey are not perfect,,· The FGrm Bureau opposes the so-coiled "Brannon Plan' ond support the present farm s·upport program with modifica tion CIS recommended by the Ameriean Form Bureau '.defat;.on. 3. the fann aureau is agelnst the so-called 'GrGngef Bill· to separate the P ...... IureGu and the extension service .lthough it is raot egel'ind su¢n 8eparution where the two are legally con nected. The Granger Bill, is interpreted by the Form Bureau os an attempt to make the SeeretOJ')' of Agriculture and by-pOS& the influenc·e and rights of the stotes. 4. The Farm Bureau favors re-organization of the Depart ment of Agriculture but opposes the plan that the Secretary of Agriculture r.-organize the department 2. .. .. |
