| OCR Text |
Show 69 security "h. so Imper6eetlons connected with it that the logic for many luppressiQn becomes tntrigtJing but what own but question by stating thot, RFtrst, no one (and) ments .•• wonts (for) that would that That would end govenment run by lew a that we eon are tt$ $ub$,titutes? He str'Ong superstate with be merely extending by and through J"w, rule out ch.ng$, healthier, he would see of others, the peopl., ·and He bel'ioved orderly to the for it is 10 only law then itS int,emctiont)lly. to 1«ge govem- i.$ written. not for ibelf peculiar It is to downright law Uied or for in the ultimate man happier law. He would be oppo&ed ptOcess to protect the inte·rest of personalty 'Mlrld at and peaceful proCe5$. While he do. hQ"ge according workh'9 for the people his to directing will, Q $,ince in faet he Invites it if it will moke exploitotion of the Judicial Law and dom,estically Thomos Q$SO¢teted law with not replies h<iVe peaceful contentiof'l, di fferenc,e of opinion, and united odion after QP," emu free discussio,n. the aemocrot'1e proc.s, both its G by men $,ingte $:ucc;e. 0 .ingle group to the group in fJ)vemment and on I! behcdf Gxclus.ively. of the theories underlying 10 IiCoUeetive security; world orgcmbotioAS bosed upon the theory of protecting the individual parts of the group \vortd organization based upon the theory of setting up Judicial processes which thoU be optionally or uncondi tionally used; world organization providing mediulll$ of exehang.e of opinion and an arming or griev<1.ftlCes; world organization providing arbitrational tri .... bunals. These are aU democratic processes. lee, cit. |
