| OCR Text |
Show 73 thought mold 'of the grMt tiberal jurish, thot school of though't represented the United States and Supreme Court by Cardoza, 8randeis, and Holmes by Douglas and Warren in the present. Law to Thomos meaN otder; it restroint dynamh:$ of a willful government repr.ented by out the cQfT)'ing law on must be M immediate longer b.half of thote w. end one true if it were no lute IVI. that related fe'y use in the conservative, for luw caprIce; to the poHticol meaN GFeAa. w. and means It would b. no ony' abso found valid ift relation In this to ,eNG thot has'ost most of Its ,meonlng The refef\tJon of the .rderly living He st.,. in r.I.lon. This relation preten' end populOI' expression (I the on he aceepts it when it true 1S0 years ago. was used to prevent ot I c:hcnge ii it reactionary. a caprlc:ious executive. Q to whom It that arbitrQry GCtion, His COl'lcept of law is soci.l (lnd relative. liberol, if one deiir. through loose not one means on longer desirable or Aec81S.Y. He would diaeard clreumstGMes of the pest. it is it in the past 16 meanl a repudiates penon.' govemm.t when en Concept of orderly change.. Only Only when tow is law is when law ;s wholly discarded .Ql social instrument Is it rodJcaL ThomO$ would stand for change through law. Con"" ditions would _.termine chan.ge. \NhGt cb things their in on orderly OUf fUdges i$ law, but Thom.' people would way, tor he wou:ld have faith in them potential capaciti. 16 people do are for not orderly conduct, monks or os .individuoJs, and and he wou:ld have faith in the scientists, but participants in the good living notional life, steering the law between the dangers of rigidity on hand and of formlessness on the other. Our system faces no theoretical stream of in our the one dilemma but a single continuous probJemt how to apply to ever-chQnging condi tions the never-ehonging principles of freedom. Statement by Chief Justice Earl Warren, Time Magarne, June 25, 1956, p. 14. |
