OCR Text |
Show Record facts. It is customary to make it so. One looking at the profile of that section of the river would get a picture that does not 3909 remotely reflect the actual drop in the river. On pages 7 and 8 of Exhibit 80, which denominate the location of rapids, Mr. Hoyt has marked as a rapid every place where, on these profile maps shown on Sheets like Sheet 54 of Exhibit 10, 3910 there is indicated an abrupt drop. On Sheets 7 to 13, inclusive, of Exhibit 10 input all the elevations down and all the changes in the grade of the river as I found them in my original field sheets, and my legend on each of those sheets discloses the presence of every rapid that was in existence in the river through the Cataract Canyon. Through Glen 3911 Canyon there are no rapid symbols shown. The rapids in Glen Canyon were lesser rapids than I had been encountering in Cataract Canyon. I would call them rapids. The profile shows them, but they are not indicated on the map. The record may show that the Sheets referred to as Sheets 7 to 13, both inclusive, are Sheets that are also lettered G, H, I, J, K, L, and M. 3917 When I made my maps I termed a sudden increase in the fall of the stream, causing rough water or wild water a rapid. If I had a condition that did not contain boulders or rough or wild water, I would not call that a rapid. It might be possible that a man who had not been upon the ground might take these Sheets showing elevations and figure up a certain change in elevation and term it a rapid, while another man who had not been on the ground might figure out the same change 3920 in elevation and not term it a rapid. 3921 Agreement reached that maps be checked and if there are any other variations, the same be explained. 3936 The Sheets in Exhibit 10, showing rapids in Glen Canyon, were compared with Sheets in Exhibit 80, and it is agreed that only one stretch designated as a rapid by Mr. Hoyt was not designated as 565 |