OCR Text |
Show 1116 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES October Term, 1929 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Complainant, ) ) vs. ) No. 15 Original ) THE STATE OF UTAH. ) Defendant. ) DIGEST OF EVIDENCE INTRODUCED AND PROCEEDINGS HAD UPON THE HEARINGS BEFORE HON. CHARLES WARREN, SPECIAL MASTER. The first hearing was had before Hon. Charles Warren, Special Master, at Washington, D. C., on September 5, 1929. APPEARANCES: For the Complaint: Charles M. Blackmar, Esq., Special Assistant to the Attorney General; Randolph 3. Collins, Esq., and Samuel H. Moyer, Esq. For the Defendant: Philo T. Farnsworth, Jr., Esq., George D. Parkinson, Esq., Deputy Attorney General of the state of Utah. Record 5 Before any evidence was introduced and before any opening 6 statement was made by counsel for either party, it was stipulated that defendant's answer on file herein is intended and shell for all purpose of this cause be considered to include and be considered and treated as including a prayer that defendant be adjudged and decreed to be the owner of all of those portions of the beds of the Colorado, Green and San Juan Rivers mentioned in subdivision number 2 of complainant's bill of complaint herein. 5 - 24 Thereupon Charles R. Blackmar, Esq., on behalf of complainant and of the evidence which complainant intended to offer. A brief digest of the substance of said opening statement follows 6 - 7 The case of U. S. V. Holt state Bank, 270 U. S. 49, was |