Page 14

Update item information
Title Ends and means in conflict
Subject Nuclear warfare--Moral and ethical aspects; War--Moral and ethical aspects; War--Religious aspects; War and emergency powers--United States; Ends and means
Description The 49th Annual Frederick William Reynolds Lecture.
Creator Firmage, Edwin Brown
Publisher Division of Continuing Education, University of Utah
Date 1987-10-15
Date Digital 2008-05-29
Type Text
Format application/pdf
Digitization Specifications Original scanned on Epson Expression 10000XL flatbed scanner and saved as 400 ppi uncompressed tiff. Display images generated in PhotoshopCS and uploaded into CONTENTdm Aquisition Station.
Resource Identifier,1147
Source U263 .F57 1987
Language eng
Relation Digital reproduction of "Ends and means in conflict," J. Willard Marriott Library Special Collections
Rights Digital Image Copyright University of Utah
Metadata Cataloger Seungkeol Choe; Ken Rockwell
ARK ark:/87278/s6x34vfm
Setname uu_fwrl
Date Created 2008-07-29
Date Modified 2008-07-31
ID 320434
Reference URL

Page Metadata

Title Page 14
Description 14 EDWIN B. FIRMAGE Congress exclusively possesses the constitutional power to initiate war, whether declared or undeclared, public or private, perfect or imperfect, de jure or de facto. The only exception is the power in the president to respond self defensively to sudden attack upon the United States. Three points also follow from constitutional text, our history, and pragmatic necessity. First, power over foreign relations was meant by the Framers to be jointly held by the Congress and the president. But much congressional direction and control have been allowed to wither by congressional default and presidential usurpation. Second, the existence of nuclear weapons and missile delivery systems cuts in the direction of this original understanding, not the reverse. That is, the argument by presidents and presidential counselors that the president must have the power instantaneously to wage nuclear war because of nuclear missile delivery time of a few minutes simply does not hold. Rather, the cosmic implications of nuclear war mitigate in favor of more institutional restraint, collegial decision rather than the potential frailty and impetuosity of one human being who decides for or against the continuation of human society and, possibly, the human species. Third, Congress possesses the power through control over expenditure, appointment, the direction of foreign policy, the government of the armed forces, censure of the president and, if necessary his impeachment, to reassert its primary power in foreign relations and its singular power to decide for peace or war. C. The War Power This position-that Congress possesses the sole power to decide for war or peace-is supported with absolute clarity of intent of the founding fathers.20 And our history, while checkered with congres- 20 In the Constitutional Convention, debates in the Committee on Detail centered around an original printed draft of the war power clause providing that "[t]he legislature of the United States shall have the power ... to make war . . . ." One member of the Committee, Charles Pinckney, opposed giving this power to Congress, claiming that its proceeding would be too slow. Pierce Butler instead said that "[H]e was for vesting the power in the President, who will have all the requisite qualities, and will not make war but when the Nation will support it." Butler's motion received no second.
Format application/pdf
Identifier 017-RNLT- firmageE_ Page 14.jpg
Source Original Manuscript: Ends and means in conflict by Edwin B. Firmage.
Setname uu_fwrl
Date Created 2008-07-29
Date Modified 2008-07-29
ID 320398
Reference URL