| OCR Text |
Show !RC Staff Rationa'le Appendix IV While CMs feel that FMs can be helpful and that they want to have a relationship with them, they do not all agree on a standard level of desired involvement with FMs beyond filtering weekly I monthly from FMs to CMs according to ref. info needed - this will need to be 1 wrked out amonq CMs & IRC I I I S2 S2 S2 S3 S3 S3 S3 T6 1 1 -1 0 No Interaction T7 TB 01 02 03 04 -2 1 1 1 1 1 1 CMs feel that the comm infrastructure to filter info to CMs should not include questions re: the FMP - CMs do not have time for this, instead CMs would like for IRC to come up w- some way to provide ongoing mentoring for the FMs - CMs would only like to have interface w - FMs re: families (come up w- ongoing training plan to -2 avoid overwhelming CMs w- FMP) CMs are interested in knowing how things are going with the families, what activities are FMs doing with the families, how are they helping the families acclimate; CMs feel that the activity log does fulfill getting info on the activities, CMs also would like for the 1 forwardinq of feedback from FMs to be reqular and consistent -1 -2 CMs are interested in having ongoing feedback about any progress that the FMs are seeing with the families; CMs feel that the activity log does not fulfill this need, CMs also would like for the forwarding -1 of feedback from FMs to be regular and consistent -2 CMs are interested in having ongoing feedback about any barriers that the FMs are seeing with the families; CMs feel that the activity log does not fulfill this need, CMs also would like for the forwarding -1 of feedback from FMs to be reqular and consistent -2 CMs are interested in knowing about any time a family accesses a community resource so that IRC can fulfill the need if possible; CMs feel that the activity log does not necessarily fulfill this need, CMs also would like for the forwarding of feedback from FMs to be 0 reqular and consistent re: accessing comm resources Page 5 of 17 I I |
