OCR Text |
Show » Pera te Pear et et thrWRENSBS EeFa ele? WOT having been made Romero nor anyone have the ownership and considered to be else should make settlement on of Colonel Don eT ol hd fy y dr Pedro Pe re) de V1Villasur. is Depords or of the tract; that it should be held royal domain for the common sr Romero, who had been permitted use so by GovTomas Velez Cachupin by his decreeto ofdo April 18, In conclusion he ordered that Miguel Romero be notified of the decision and warned that he must not again Present petitions in bad faith, and peal would 1353 PUEBLOS FELIPE. be allowed. OF SANTO advised DOMINGO SAN Grant. Papers transferred to packet containing all pueblo claims. 1354 in ‘aptaain of Capt Facsimile of Signature uel Delgado. that no ap- AND dnd eee 5 of Signature of anyone who desired to pasture stock, without exclud- ing BoP errr) iay J oF 9-4 -§-§--4~3 Pda PEP) Pada ee SE dae in 1739, Facsimile PROCEEDING IN A DISPUTE between the Indians of Santa Clara and San Ildef onso and certain Facsimile Labadia. of Sl enature oO D Don Man- Dy Wor rning? } of Don Domingo Rr F i oy i.é Be iS Fs De a Pe tOJe |PIPL ere the grant a by law, and the attempted settlement made by Miguel Romero in 1765, and for other reasons proper to consider, declared the grant to be of no value and that neither Andrés Montoya nor his heirs had acquired any right to the Capulin Tract. He further decided that the fact that Romero had pastured his stock on the tract gave him no right of property therein, because it had been done without just title (justo titulo) ; that he might use it in the same way it had been used by the natives of Cochiti and the that adjoining citize—ns as royal domain; that neither Miguel de Us i SEIUTE REPS PEPE PE PE o-s 9 Serete Pe Setits ro Fe Pw prescribed Af Seda wet LAE PEL EAL SL PEP perp Oe Pe of the alealde, Bartolomé Fernandez, on leaf 10, which clearly showed that the possession given to Andrés Montoya was lacking in the necessary requisite of the summoning of the owners of the adjacent lands, and also because of no settlement having been made within the period * ee Ph Co Se eile ek ae re i Pire PnP PLLre rt pel. ke 2-9-8 ee -¢a Pe ee PP oe ert Sto ed ale ecient anal hk Re tt ok be he kd ri ee 734 ae . = case, saying in substance that having examined the proceedings and in view of the nullity of the grant appearing on leaves 5 and 6 thereof, and the convincing argument s CT a hoa AE ater erAee ne. Pe Se He urges that if the documents he had himself presented as evidencing his right to the place be considered as having no value, his having kept his stock there for five and one-half years is favorable to his contention, and he alleges great damages on account of having been prevented making a settlement at the place in question. On April 25th, Governor Mendinueta finally decided the Ls eps —_ THE SPANISH ARCHIVES OF NEW MEXICO SS Ea CREP Pra) CPA FP Fe, Pe POOL 416 sr iat ge ae a LE t ES . a a beet? See 7 nee C3 a eee PEP GS or ne zs -§2- 8-48 es ‘2 9 6 Fie ey eala. D ae PEM bl RPI <9. Peter rie Lee beatin pe reek Fe al Die aad rer ef) oto m eeoe hr ese dug bod ore eet PPL eee PEPSI PEEP a aa al FPL pe CAP a yea . UT sea RY CEL eae? rash ieee ibd pe Ne peed aPae SPrars |