| OCR Text |
Show ae or cultivated land on said tract. However, they oi aint to run their stock on it, as did other citues 7 1s was to be done without injury to the Cote eae Indians. The chief alcalde of reel dy : aan Guerrero, was directed to carry a . . : ellect; and the governor further directed coma ae sae certified copy of the will filed in the cnet tosaghiis Romero be attached to the other papers ssi : oe to the people of Cochiti and San Ilde- ae ies order 0 e owners of lands adjoining the Capulin Tract, the officers of the cavalry company at Santa Fe, inL that tl ; ; interests, ley might state anything favorable to their dinueta ordered r i r Piererer) fi Pa hl oP ed Fei PYwe dah we eraaes Be tA bah PEs, acd PES ers top Parra bel hk beer 3-* PUP < iJ 4.4 Erne Ye FEF Ld bl oe or ~ pee, ae et ee Pee eSEres es4 sa Lasete tateh Zoz5; r Al eae Sa ee a a e"F eo" ew LP Pel er) iF LF a) Firas, ES PEGI So of re. eid Le, oa 1. er 43-8 LF hb Pee ee we oe Pee Pe (ht ye rere e Pare a -— 3 LaF; # PEPER PE Sere res MPEPE tape ee Pee A Pa Pe weevespeeee Be ene Bes bet be Pe ee be +304= tn et e rare er eee Bear Hip. Pee re |rire) 7 pa[PEP ee ae bs+ote 24. wtetetet ets Jakes ere. done + : 7; a FS oS * Bitede 5 a petition to Moe previous presented ise his Romero Subsequently, proceedings in the case and the governor, asking that the presented be delivered to the instruments which he had y. present his side of the controvers hat he might Pedro Fermin de Menrnor Gove i767, 22, anes sue hed to the pro- a eed that "WE ae ena into effect and that the parties be again —o o under no circumstances should they have a Miguel out that said used for the a z LE LBL DFT s- 68 Gna?te SPOR IEP IAI LEP 2-¢ PAPER J | eed OIE ed oe* ee Be*-4-9--2-+ a ee ee ee ee oe Ss8S85 directing ned Fe, reported that they had exami had found boundaries therein stated, and commons boundaries did not include the horse-herd of the garrison. his petition to be attac ro as requested. ceedings and delivered to Rome of his case, alleging ment state a made then Romero prejudicial to the not was land the of y their occupanc leagues more than 314 Indians of Cochiti, because it was that in the space between distant from their pueblo and than 40 Spanish famthe two places, were situated more do not in any nest ies famil these He says that ilies. should be thought 1t why asks damage the Indians, and He says 3 1766. Madrid and EnOn hake: 1, 1766, Lieutenant Tomas on of Santa garris royal the of el, Esquib de sco sign Franci the grant and the FOr 48; they assented, saying *. ee elez, - pril to which injure them, etc. that he and his brother would is concerned, = damages that so far as San Ildefonso is distant about 314 leagues. result to that pueblo, which Fe ae the order of the governor, whatever. nothing = 17 copy, ed certified = ie of the ee IIIS2 8Fe LEILA prior to the making pe ON Oe day * , one and ae the land in question is referred to on the third oT oe instrument. The testator, in describing two As : : cies which he owned, refers to the second one in eatin : : ¢ And the other on the other side of the el e : orte, which I have not put under cultivation oe : oe illness, which is between the gardens of the ee . : an Ildefonso and Cochiti, the boundaries of os ss distant from each garden half a league.’’ — . omero's statement transmitting this grant to — sets - the will, is followed by an order of Gov- ae ae a: 2 ee PLU n the margin, on the act of possession. j by Governor Mendoza, duntine that the esa entered on the proper book in the archives. — will, heretofore referred to, was dated June ? Es} ere ¥s a he desig- pm ie which On the day this order was issued (April 18, 1765,) the the alealde of Santa Fe, Don Francisco Guerrero, notified that Romeros of the contents of the order and they stated they would obey, but also that they had certain matters govin their defense which they desired to lay before the ernor. The next proceeding, in chronological sequence, is an argument by Bartolomé Fernandez, on behalf of the Ins and dians, criticising the gran t filed by the Romero filed, and showing its defects, as well as those of the will in the latter the inconsistencies existing between recitals regard to the and others in the act of possession, with manuThis argumen t is on leaf 10 of the boundaries. by Fernandez, signed note, a by ed follow is and script, of La Canada transmitting the papers to the alealde for the latter's Cruz) Santa de Cafiada la de (Villa Nueva of April 18, 1765. compliance with the governor’s order The entries by Fernandez are not dated. the alealde of La On July 7, 1765, Don Manuel Garcia, er the San IlCafiada, reported that he had ealled togeth ed them of inform defonso Indians and the citizens and * boundaries nates in his petition, as also his boundaries run on the east the Rio del Norte, on the west by the high mountai n ie runs from Cochiti, on the north one league farther pa sine — inc of the Indians of San Ildefonso of th Roose Ait farther up from the gardens 419 2 > ae with the same . 6 9 “GOO eer a a to him eee es O<F-e-@ ~G~4 Ree Pe ee on the west by the The act of possession, October 7, 1739. sion tain Antonio Montoya, chief alcalde of etl Pe ‘i to say about the boundaries: ‘‘And I gave it (the pos- Session ) s er yr er) and heL el its ‘i Ri o del Norte e be ak te of San Ildefonso, and on the south by those of Cochiti being distant from each of the two mentioned places of om eae ne pe a league; and also it is bounded Depot eas eee THE SPANISH ARCHIVES OF NEW MEXICO THE SPANISH ARCHIVES OF NEW MEXICO lal BP 2 414 Bebe iho tea PO er 4-0 *-«e as, be Poe * Poy tl Bo ei dell Peel -“e-# or ORES ISTE TSA. Sea tiel bi yh aap aaats te deh bt 2s Li bok ak eeehe ed ti R EERE |
