| OCR Text |
Show eereee yd) 2 Sag ey ees wey | PIER iatZe che ToT: Py . grant and he did not ad- proves of Madrid, dated September 27, 1704, which clearly showed the justice of Bra- ex cinas to Ignacio Roybal was made to the injury of the Indians; that that being true with how much more reason did the Indians claim that they were injured by the grant | for the measurements made by the al- In view 0 th prabhegther within their boundaries than that made to Roybal. The answer made by Tafoya and the other papers were sent to Juan Gomez Lujan, on February and Marcos Lucero, heirs of Juana 28, 1763, for reply thereto. The reply was signed by Juan Gomez del Castillo. denies the statement He Madrid in order that he might build a house thereon. He faith ean a house pane to serve as | ner of settling the dispute in an equitable way and with- big royal rty pe i they may be herd of horses necessary to the service, there being included in the ranch that was called that of Pedro on red bed situate in the valley of the little call Vin Guages; and as to what relates along the boundary Ildefonso, and edges of the river, upward, Marcos Lucero, a citizen tresof the cultivated land of said may be destroyed, or the said the benefit of the said Pueblo, stable and known landmark , ; on April 24, 1765, the substitute tonite Antonio José Ortiz, in compliance with the Wor : mide governor called together of the hi oI gy ir attorney, and all the heirstheof people Juana Lujan and he made another argument for the Indians, The opinion requested is dated October 27, 1764, and, oo o : nee ae On November 3, 1763, the papers were again ordered to be sent to the attorney for the Indians, Felipe Tafoya, after a brief review of conditions existing, amounts only to a suggestion as to the best and most practicable man- San unoccupied, in need stock, of which they have an to a nor ude el by ee the boundaries eon eau 2 San Ildefonso, — sis be remain for He makes quite an argument on the facts developed! and and of which saan hb Sane pe el they give a right to Following this is an order of November 12, 1763, by Governor Velez Cachupin, directing that the proceedings be transmitted to the licentiate, Don Fernando de Torija y Leri at Chihuahua, in order that he give a legal opinion on the points involved. gy ae the possessor, how much more do sixty-odd years give it to us.’’ He for . says that the grant which he had already exhibited proved the contrary; that from the date of the grant to the date of his reply it had been duly held and cultivated without interference by those claiming under it, and he remarks: in good free the extent nec kate dhe made by Tafoya, in first presenting the case, that the Indians had loaned the land to Matias ‘Tf ten years of possession are lands there is nie ie ee af the Pueblo ob Gam tdetonsn alt aba | . a to Madrid, calde, Madrid, showed that Fernandez’ grant was further vt. Ee = made a i by the decision of the govern- ete 7 fi [ Sllawcd ee i? NOM (ag tay This are 12. 1765. which is in effect a grant of or, date ‘hs ele ta the Indians thereof. He says: jem sen . th oa that on the west, directly toward the ee ef We ren aE PE Por] a a) Seiten: PRESS <“8~9~ [ a if” ape t citizens be of Naba : a J and that the Spanish be orshould cicas thal dtaeli wuiside of shoes Goon dictal (me esata eep heaton decision FO Pt OE Fs Ped by the Marquis said to erect eeee for of intending pe stated that the grant made contention, accused er ery client’s was the Indians and suggested that monuments on the PS his ac a. eat ee eae ae A Pe 9.415 ty= Ph AEPEPAe in favor the which “ina Pe (see leaf 9 of his archive) Per rae 4 Peres decision Pr SSeS prec Pad senesesrerarer pe eee ered ererera ae tarey Ser eryan to the ana | | | - ws to them the of the governor. a Ame the Indians stated decision they were in conformit y TI ae decision as to the eastern and western sides, but wit . the northern, because the house of Marcos ni hich was designated to them as a boundary, was . nidat of the lands which they had always recoga sat siete for the boundary which they had always aie ae Waid been an arroyo which top them by Governor Juan Paez had been Hurtado; pointed that if wa by Madrid to Juana Lujan Ca deed made mit the value of these documents; that he called attention oe 6 the “* i. ed PA Pera ot De ee 2 bs PL ee ee FEBS PS 4 SP examined Oo had bee he 4 that made to Matias Madrid by Governor Cubero and also the 4° stating to ‘G<4@¢- them hat the best way fg se a ue frau the * | a ied lands on the north and west, an amount suffiseni e tak k what they are lacking to the cient to : up dich they wero -omeinied complete «ie Akay ap full ine ‘ of the governor relative! to/the tiovee pet cae tt te for : 7? 5 ae a rs iret ‘4 RE at ea * tna he LJ # Leu a PD i oe ts ere nue bare Bee et ei ee ~¢—-% Pie tA. MIE -?). 7 .. PL PEP eo -s-8— ee | ie eS Paar te Pe er 2 Se Pees eee oes $358 af oe eres ge fh] Pera SSF i ad Po Fe Fd bee PE es Pre)2 eeee eee zere st; * $e Fe) thd hd Are make any statement they saw fit in support of their conaman Felipe Tafoya, as attorney for the Indians, made answer ies 1 h the same class of controversies in other pp ed Hn 4pe might Cn ee ead Co they 7 that sah sit: ces pueblos. : : Fan order : the governor sea i Pld Re te 2 array ee ae Indians and LP Er Erte” to 7” in all @: 4° 2249 lee tke to him the them ie) the papers sent pe alealde returned 407 THE SPANISH ARCHIVES OF NEW MEXICO 38.4. 45%5 THE SPANISH ARCHIVES OF NEW MEXICO an pie 406 Ee ee ge } _. toes o--§. 5:9 8 6 a rare i eee eo ee ed of Pe Petes pe 3 oe aed ee eae ee Ce ee Le VEL ELE PE} ebetineetin cs lek fa! we ae Ce Marre S ~~ Pa aa ris 5 eM 6 a is TEESE ESTEE |
