OCR Text |
Show l40 SEXUAL SELECTION : BIRDS. PART II. deeper indentation at tho divergent than at the convergent end. It is also manifest that if the convergence were strongly pronounced and the confluence complete, the indentation at tho convergent end would tend to be quite obliterated. ~rhe tail-feathers in both species of peacock are entirely destitute of ocelli, and this apparently is related to their being covered up and concealed by the long tail-coverts. In this respect they differ remarkably from the tail-feathers of Polyplectron, which in most of the species are ornamented with larger ocelli than those on the tail-coverts. Hence I was led carefully to examine the tail-feathers of the several species of Polyplcctron in order to discover whether the ocelli in any of them shewed any tendency to disappear, and, to my great satisfaction, I was successful. The central tail-feathers of P. Napoleonis have the two ocelli on each side of the .shaft perfectly developed; but the inner ocellus becomes less and less conspicuous on the more exterior tailfeathers, until a mere shadow or rudimentary vestige is left on the inner side of the outermost feather. Again, in P. malaccense, the ocelli on the tail-coverts are, as we have seen, confluent; and these feathers are of unusual length, being two-thirds of the length of the taU-feathers, so that in both these respects they resemble the tail-coverts of the peacock. Now in this species the two .central tail-feathers alone are ornamented, each with two brightly-coloured ocelli, the ocelli having completely disappeared from the inner sides of all the other tailfeathers. Consequently the tail-coverts and tail-feathers of this species of Polyplectron make a near approach .in structure and ornamentation to the corresponding feathers of the peacock. As far, then, as the principle of gradation throws light on the steps by which the magnificent train of the peacock has been acquired, hardly anything more CHAP. XIV. GRADATION OF OIIARACTERS. 14l is needed. We may picture to ourselves a progenitor of the peacock in an almost exactly intermediate condition between the existing peacock, with his enormously elongated tail-coverts, ornamented with single ocelli, and an ordinary gallinaceous bird with short tail-coverts, merely spotted with some colour; and we shall then see in our mind's eye, a bird possessing tail-coverts, capable of erection and expansion, ornamented with two partially confluent ocelli, and long enough almost to conceal the tail-feathers,-the latter having already partially lost their ocelli; we shaH see in short, a Polyplectron. The indentation of the central disc and surrounding zones of the ocellus in both species of peacock, seems to mo to speak plainly in favour of this view; and this structure is otherwise inexplicable. The males of Polyplectron are no doubt very beautiful birds, but their beauty, when viewed from a little distance, cannot be compared, as I formerly saw in the Zoological Gardens, with that of the peacock. Many female progenitors of the peacock must, during a long line of descent, have appreciated this superiority; for they have unconsciously, by the continued preference of the most beautiful males, rendered the peacock the most splendid of living birds. Argus pheasant.-Another excellent case for investigation is offered by the ocelli on the wing-feathers of the Argus pheasant, which are shaded in so wonderful a manner as to resemble balls lying within sockets, and which consequently differ from ordinary ocelli. No one,. I presume, will attribute the shading, which has excited the admiration of many experienced artists, to chance -to the fortuitous concourse of atoms of colouring matter. That these ornaments should have been formed through the selection of many successive variations, not one of which was originally intended to produce the |