OCR Text |
Show (4) (3) Ground (2) Ground Water Ground Water Depletion Water Depletion Gillespie Dam (1) Depletion upstream to Dome (5) Water upstream from Gillespie (Col. 2- Accumulation Year from Dome1 Dam2 Col. 3) of Col 4 32 + 302.7 + 338.3 - 35.6 + 555.9 33 - 138.9 - 18.8 - 120.1 + 435.8 34 - 338.9 - 188.2 - 150.7 + 285.1 1935 - 169.5 - 131.6 - 37.9 + 247.2 36 - 316.9 - 185.6 - 131.3 + 115.9 37 + 52.0 + 36.7 + 15.3 + 131.2 38 - 422.9 - 359.8 - 63.1 + 68.1 39 - 662.5 - 519.7 - 142.8 - 74.7 1940 - 811.1 - 638.0 - 173.1 - 247.8 41 + 162.3 - 30.4 + 192.7 - 55.1 42 - 672.9 - 518.5 - 154.4 - 209.5 43 - 697.2 - 529.4 - 167.8 - 377.3 44 - 805.9 - 647.3 - 158.6 - 535.9 1945 - 972.0 - 808.6 - 163.4 - 699.3 46 - 969.4 - 922.6 - 46.8 - 746.1 47 -1,199.9 -1,149.7 - 50.2 - 796.3 48 -1,407.1 -1,322.4 - 84.7 - 881.0 49 -1,035.6 - 957.5 - 78.1 - 959.1 1950 -1,363.2 -1,256.9 - 106.3 -1,065.4 51 -1,601.8 -1,703.3 + 101.5 - 963.9 Source of Data Plaintiff's Exhibit 77-B, U.S.B.R. Memorandum Supplement to "Report on Water Supply of the Lower Colorado River Basin, Project Planning Report, November, 1952" dated November 1953. !Table G, p. 33. 2Table F, p. 32. Supporting Data For California Exhibit No. 1440 |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits. |