| OCR Text |
Show -3- Exhibit Iden. Evid. No. Page No. Page No. 1378 Extract from Debate on H.R. 5773, S. 728, S. J. Res. 164, and H. Res. 208 (Fourth Swing-Johnson Bill), 70th Cong., 1st and 2d Sess. (70 Cong. Rec. 464). (Pre-Trial Item 234.) 11,436 1380 Extracts from Brief of the States of Colorado, New Mexico, and Nevada in Support of the Motion by Defendant States to Dismiss the Bill of Complaint, Arizona v. California, 283 U.S. 423 (1931). (pp. 29-30, 39-40) 11,436 1381 Extract from Protest and Brief of the States of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming against the execution of the proposed contract pending before the Secretary of the Interior, providing for the storage and delivery of water from the Boulder Canyon Reservoir, November 12, 1934. (pp. 18-20) 11,436 1382 Extract from Protest and Brief of the State of California and its Interested Communities, and of the State of Nevada, in re: Proposed contract of the State of Arizona, providing for storage and delivery of water from the Boulder Canyon Reservoir. November 10, 1934. (p. 12) 11,436 1383 Extract from Report of the American Section of the International Water Commission, United States and Mexico, H. Doc. 359, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. (1930). (pp. 92-93) 11,436 11,580 |
| Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits. |
