OCR Text |
Show part of that year) of the missing month bore to the remainder of the months. Discharges for the period April to December, 1900 and the years 1901, 1902, 1903 and l90i|., were estimated by means of Plate 5, which shows for the years of concurrent record (1915 to 1928, inclusive), the relation between the annual flows at San Carlos to the annual flows at Kelvin. The resulting Kelvin flows are as follows: Flow Gila River • Estimated Flow Ye ar at San Carlos : Gila at Kelvin 1900 (a) 90,000 ... F. 150,000 \. F. 1901 200,000 " • 300,000 tt 1902 100,000 " • 163,000 tt 1903 111,000 " 200,000 tt 1904 163,000 " 265,000 it (a) Period April to December only, flow at San Carlos estimated by applying the rating table for this station shown in'.'r.S.P. 52 to the daily gage heights published in W.S.P. 51. |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits. |