| OCR Text |
Show CALIFORNIA DEFENDANTS Exhibit No. 1442-A Identification: Jul 17 1957 Admitted Jul 17 1957 Comparison of Annual Virgin Channel Losses Plaintiff's Exhibits 64, 77, 77-B Unit: 1000 Acre-feet (5) (4) Natural loss . (2) Virgin channel from Gillespie (1) Virgin flow Virgin flow loss, Gillespie Dam to Gila Water Gila River at Gila River near Dam to Dome River at Year Gillespie Dam 1 Dome 2 (Col. 2-Col. 3) mouth 7 1914 1,313.1 926.5 386.6 598 1915 5,370.3 4,866.2 504.1 728 1916 5,980.6 5,576.3 404.3 885 1917 2,231.4 1,770.5 460.9 673 1918 839.1 507.5 331.6 408 1919 2,138.3 1,643.7 494.6 666 1920 4,200.5 3,763.6 436.9 670 1921 1,145.7 777.3 368.4 558 1922 1,743.7 1,352.7 391.0 501 1923 1,469.3 1,077.8 391.5 573 1924 1,836.5 1,399.2 437.3 380 1925 639.8 332.1 307.7 330 1926 1,781.0 1,353.1 427.9 492 1927 2,389.4 1,946.6 442.8 582 1928 570.7 270.9 299.8 300 1929 955.7 602.4 353.3 409 1930 1,013.3 658.5 354.8 384 1931 1,480.1 1,079.6 400.5 507 1932 2,869.8 2,364.4 505.4 610 1933 733.5 415.4 318.1 315 1934 313.7 42.2 271.5 220 Supporting Data For California Exhibit No. 1442 |
| Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits. |
