OCR Text |
Show -2- (1) Water Year . (2) Virgin flow Gila River at Gillespie Dam 1 (3) Virgin flow, Gila River near Dome 2 Virgin channel loss, Gillespie Dam to Dome (Col. 2-Col. 3) (5) Natural loss from Gillespie Dam to Gila River at mouth 7 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1,691.0 1,077.6 2,375.1 803.1 670.6 1,256.1 711.9 1,883.7 475.6 355.9 434.9 365.7 491.4 327.5 314.7 520 410 615 385 320 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 664.5 5,187.9 1,108.1 936.4 845.5 349.4 4,678.5 734.2 587.0 517.1 315.1 509.4 373.9 349.4 328.4 515 790 355 380 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 994.0 447.6 426.9 550.6 1,751.9 640.7 88.3 73.7 144.2 1,281.9 353.3 359.3 353.2 406.4 470.0 1950 1951 376.2 510.4 45.2 280.1 331.0 230.3 Large Circles 1914-1945 Average 1000 Acre-Feet Virgin channel losses Gillespie Dam to Dome 3 419.1 Virgin flow at Gillespie Dam 4 1,792.8 Virgin channel losses Phoenix Area 5 446.2 Virgin flow Granite Reef plus Kelvin 6 1,970.6 Source of Data: Plaintiff's Exhibit 77, U.S.B.R. "Report on Water Supply of the Lower Colorado River Basin, Project Planning Report, November 1952" and Memorandum Supplement thereto, dated November 1953, Plaintiff's Exhibit 77-B. 1 Plaintiff's Exhibit 77-B, Table F, p. 32. 2 Plaintiff's Exhibit 77-B, Table G, p. 33. 3 Plaintiff's Exhibit 77, p. 195, item (192). 4 Plaintiff's Exhibit 77, p. 194, item (190). 5 Plaintiff's Exhibit 77, p. 194, item (186). 6 Summation of item (182), p. 194 and item (150), p. 192, respectively, Plaintiff's Exhibit 77. 7 Plaintiff's Exhibit 64, pp. 284-285. |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits. |