OCR Text |
Show 184 PROBLEMS OF IMPERIAL VALLEY AND VICINITY. Power sites, Colorado River Basin below Flaming Gorge, Juniper, Rangely, and Kremmling} Index No. on map. Name. Stream. State. Average present discharge. Head. How created. Horsepower, at 88 per cent efficiency at turbines. 13 12 Juniper............ Cross Mountain.... Yampa River. ...do......rv.. Colorado........ .....do........... Sec.-ft. 1,800 1,800 Feet. «150 »100 Dam............ .....do........... 27,000 18,000 Total, Yampa River. Rangely........... Flaming Gorge..... Browns Park.,.... 45,000 White River.. GreenRiver- main stem. . .do........ Colorado........ Utah............ Colorado........ Utah............ .....do.......... .....do.......... .....do.......... Dam............ 225 - foot dam, 215 - foot tunnel. Dam............ Dam and tunnel. Dam.i.......... .....do.......... .....do.......... 17 760 »160 12,000 9 10 18 19 20 21 2,700 2,700 5,800 7,800 7,800 7,800 •440 *300 >250 «200 «165 <160 119,000 81,000 145,000 156,000 129,000 139,000 Split Mountain Canyon. Minnie Maud...... Rattlesnake........ Coal Creek......... .....do........ ......do........ .....do........ ...do........ Total, Green R iver-main stem -Dewey........... 769,000 Grand River.. .....do........ Colorado........ .....do.......... 1,600 6,000 Dam and tunnel. Dam............ 25 24 Mil •150 65,000 90,000 Total, Grand River 155,000 Cataract Canyon .. Glen Canyon...... Colorado River .....do........ Utah............ Arizona......... .....do.......... .....do.......... .....do.......... .....do.......... Arizona-Nevada. .....do.......... .....do.......... Dam............ .....do.......... .....do.......... .....do.......... .....do.......... 30 31 38 33 34 39 35 36 37 17,000 20,500 20,500 20,500 20,500 20,500 22,000 22,000 22,000 »400 »450 »300 »125 «285 *185 M80 *155 *75 680,000 922,000 •615,000 •256,000 •584,000 •379,000 1,056,000 341,000 165,000 Marble Canyon___ Andrus Canyon ... Diamond Creek ... Spencer Canyon... Boulder Canyon... Bulls Head........ Williams Fork___ Total, Colora-doRiver below junction Total, Colorado River Basin (exclusive of San Juan).. .....do........ .....do........ .....do........ .....do........ .....do........ .....do........ .....do........ .....do.......... .....do.......... .....do.......... .....do.......... 4,998,000 5,979,000 1 Omitting the Grand Canyon region. 2 From reclamation data. 8 Head is from application before Power Commission. Power created is from multiplying this head by estimate of available flow made for this report and is not the power given in application. * From E. C. La Rue, Water-Supply Paper No. 395, as to head; discharge is from analysis made for this report. * Head and discharge from E. C. La Rue, Water-Supply Paper No. 395. • « Based on assumption of regulation of flow by storage above these sites. |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |