OCR Text |
Show 180 PROBLEMS OF IMPERIAL VALLEY AND VICINITY. Mouth of Little Snake to mouth of Yampa. [Control by Juniper reservoir on Yampa and possible reservoir on Little Snake, or on Yampa below mouth of Little Snake.] Present average annual discharge.............................acre-feet. 1, 880,000 Estimated ultimate after irrigation develops above...............do___ 1, 560, 000 Equated discharge: Present...............................................second-feet.. 2, 600 . Ultimate..................................................do___ 2,180 Elevation at mouth of Little Snake about.........................feet.. 5,850 Elevation at mouth of Yampa....................................do.'... 4, 980 Total fall..................................................do.... 870 Distance.........................................................miles. 45 Potential horsepower: Present.......................................................... 226,000 Ultimate........................................................,. 190,000 WHITE RIVER. Rangely reservoir site to mouth. [Rangely reservoir site (17) is the controling reservoir.] Rangely reservoir site, capacity.............................awe-feet.. 900,000 Present average annual discharge............................... .do___ 550,000 Estimated ultimate after irrigation above...................,___do___ 360,000 Storage capacity to equate stream.....r - - -.....................do___ 330,000 Raise in water surface for 900,000 acre-foot capacity...............feet.. 200 Head below 330,000 acre-foot storage.............................do___ 160 Equated discharge: Present.............................................second-feet.. 760 Ultimate..................................................do___ 500 Elevation of outlets.............................................. .feet.. 4,960 Elevation at mouth of river....................................do___ 4,640 Total fall..................................................do___ 320 Distance........................................................miles.. , 70 Potential horsepower at dam site: Present.......................................................... 12,200 Ultimate.....'..................................................... 8,000 Potential horsepower in section: Present.......................................................... 24,300 Ultimate.......................................................... 16,000 MAIN STREAM OF GREEN RIVER. Flaming Gorge reservoir site to mouth of Yampa. [Flaming Gorge is the controling reservoir.] Flaming Gorge reservoir site (9) capacity....................acre-feet.. 4,000, 000 Present average annual discharge......................¦..........do___ 1, 920,000 Estimated ultimate after irrigation development above...........do---- 1,120, 000 Storage capacity to equate stream................................do___ 1, 000, 000 Raise in water surface for 4,000,000 acre-foot capacity..............feet... 240 Head below 3,000,000 acre-foot capacity..........................do___ 210 Equated discharge: Present...............................................second-feet.. . 2, 700 Future.....................................................do___ 1, 600 Elevation of outlets.............................................feet.. 6,035 Elevation at Yampa mouth.......................................do----- 4, 980 Total fall..................................................do___ 1,055 Distance........................................................miles.. 80 Potential horsepower at dam site: Present.......................................................... 56, 700 Ultimate.......................................................... 33, 600 Potential horsepower between outlets and mouth of Y ampa: Present.......................................................... 285,000 Ultimate.......................................................... 169,000 |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |