OCR Text |
Show CALIFORNIA DEFENDANTS Exhibit No. 2631 Identification: Jan. 17, 1958 Tr. 15,521 Admitted Summary of Data Shown by Steenbergen Exhibits (at Imperial Dam) u. s. Project or Diversion Farm Con- *Project Ex. No. Area Requirement sumptive Use Losses Efficiency 8 North Gila 42,920 23,540 19,380 54.8% 9 South Gila 62,910 34,500 28,410 54.8% 10 Wellton-Mohawk 599,300 268,640 330,660 44.8% 11 Yuma Mesa 321,480 100,590 220,890 31.3% 13 UnitB 38,280 12,600 25,680 32.9% 15 Yuma Valley 325,830 158,600 167,230 48.7% Total 1,390,720 598,470 792,250 43.0% ?Computed ratio of Farm Consumptive Use to Diversion Requirement. |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |