| OCR Text |
Show Table 5. OILA RIVER INDIAN RESERVATION MARICOPA DISTRICT Area irrigated and diversions of irrigation w^. Diversions Area Surface Pumped Y*ar irrigated water 3/ water 4/ Total Acres Ac.ft. Ac.ft. Ac.ft. 1901 1,080 1/ _ _ _ 1904 1,323 %/ 1,271 y - _ 1914 _ _ _ 1930 4,989 _ 4,989 1931 - 4,832 - 4,832 1932 2,568 _ 2,568 1933 _ 1,822 _ 1,822 1934 - 1,498 _ 1,498 1935 - 1,530 - 1,530 1936 - 1,053 3,303 4,356 1937 - 1,188 3,452 4,640 1938 - 1,632 3,916 5,548 1939 - 515 5,049 5,564 1940 - 579 5,281 5,860 1941 _ 1,844 2,954 4,798 1942 _ 5,985 5,985 1943 - - 5,758 5,758 1944 - - 5,353 5,353 1945 - 5,476 5,476 1946 _ 5,646 5,646 1947 _ _ 5,633 5,633 1948 _ _ 5,624 5,624 1949 - - 5,379 5,379 1950 - - 5,843 5,843 1951 712 2/ 496 2/ 476 V 1,079 2/ 1,030 2/ - 5,813 5,813 1952 _ 5,549 5,549 1953 _ 5,909 5,909 1954 - 5,724 5,724 1955 - 5,286 5,286 1/ From "Report on the San Carlos Irrigation Project and the History of Irrigation 1915. 2/ From Annual Irrigation Crop Reports. 7/ Compiled from Court Water Commissioner Records. 4/ Plaintiff's Exhibit 158, Column 4 - Arizona v. California et al. $J United States of America, as Guardian v. N. W. Haggard, et al. Decree dated June 11, 1903. |
| Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |
