OCR Text |
Show 0-3: Answer (Cont'd): Project or Reservation Net Irrigated and Irrigable Area 1/ Consumptive Use On Net Irrigated and Irrigable Area _/2 (Acres) (Acre-Feet) 7,743 25,808 39,705 Diversion Requirement (Acre-Feet) 1,939 591 2,530 1,246 8,570 9,816 6,267 l,8so 8,117 3*3^7 16,879 12,534 3,700 16,234 6,179 27,287 33,466 309 CALIFORNIA (Continued) Yuma TOTAL CALIFORNIA NEVADA Fort Mohave Moapa TOTAL NEVADA NEW MEXICO Navajo Zuni TOTAL NEW MEXICO UTAH Shlvwlts TOTAL ALL RESERVATIONS 1/ Gross area reduced for non-irrigated areas. 2/ The quantity indicated includes non-agricultural uses and reservoir losses where applicable. Does not include non-agricultural uses not related to irrigable areas. Omission here to include such uses is not to be deemed a waiver of right to make the same. Bracketed figures as amended by Walter Kitchel,Jr., As3t. Atty. •> General, Dept, of Justice. See Tr., pp. 13,647-48.] \-£> ^?The foregoing tabulation does not include requirements for the non-Indian and Florence-Casa Orande units of the San Carlos Project. Those units do not Involve Indian uses or rights In behalf of Indians. For information, however, the data above given as to the Indian uses is as follows with respect to these unitst San Carloa Projeot Non-Indian 45,000 Florenoe-Casa Orande 1,390 122,715 3,790 270,000 8,3*0 August 2, 1957 1890. |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |