OCR Text |
Show TABLE C- 30 MAJOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE CENTRAL UTAH 1ROJECT Units in Proposed Order of Construction Farmland Receiving Additional Water ( acres) F. m. l ind Receiving Full Irritation Service f. cres) Municipal Water Supplied Yearly ( acre- feet) Closed Drains for Project Lands ( miles) upen Draini for Project Lands ( miles) Land Used for Opsn Drains ( acres) New Canals ( miles) Land Used for Project Canals ( acres) New Roads ( miles) Land Used for New Roads ( acres) Road Relocation ( miles) Land Used for Road Relocation ( acres) Road Improved ( miles) Tunnel ( miles) Tunnel Spoil ( cu, yd) Area for Tunnel Spoil Disposal ( acres) 2/ Buried Pipeline ( miles) Trans- Mission Line ( miles) Big Game Habitat Lost ( acres) Upland Game Habitat Lost ( acres) Waterfowl Habitat Lost ( acres) Fur fearer Habitat Lost ( acres) Loss of Open and Green Space ( acres) Stream Inundated ( miles) Stream With Reduced Flows ( miles) 3/ Stream With Improved Flows ( miles) High Mountain Reservoirs Stabilized ( number) Reservoir Surface Gained ( acres) Lake Surface Lost Through Diking ( acres) Marsh Land Lost ( acres) Potential Induced Nourural Population Increase Depletion of Colorado River ( ac- ft/ yr) Increased Salt Concentration Lake Mead ( mg/ D Cost per Year to Downstream Water Users 1/ With maximum Ute Indian Unit development: Uinta Basin: Vernal Unit 1,500 0 1,600 21 1 10 17 210 0 0 3 40 0 0 0 0 17 4 i/ y 0 0 900 0 15 0 0 900 0 0 3,300 12,000 1 33,600 Bonneville Unit 26,500 0 0 7 0 0 2 20 15 180 34 410 45 29 780,500 16 13 42 10,900 8,300 3,000 600 13,400 20 143 5 0 13,400 0 0 0 165,900 10 414,000 Jensen Unit 3,600 400 18,000 6 4 50 0 0 0 0 2 10 2 0 0 0 4 20 500 500 0 0 500 3 2 0 0 500 0 0 40,000 15,000 1 33,600 Upalco Unit 42,600 0 0 0 0 0 12 140 3 40 4 50 0 0 0 0 0 2 1,200 800 0 0 1,200 4 7 2 14 1,200 0 0 0 10,300 1 33,600 Uintah Unit 45,200 7,800 1,000 5/ y 5/ 0 0 0 0 7 80 0 0 0 0 0 3 1,100 1,100 0 0 1,100 5 18 0 12 1,100 0 0 2,200. 30,500 3 100,000 Ute Indian Unit Basin Totals 102,700 20,900 17,000 5/ 37 440 184 2,200 42 500 11 130 0 81 2,263,100 47 15 89 5,000 6,000 0 0 6.000 J, 14 8_ _ 0 6,000 _ 0 _ 0 38,000 315,000 2i 1,159,200 222,100 29,100 37,600 34 42 500 215 2,580 60 720 61 720 47 110 3,043,600 63 49 160 18,700 16,700 3,000 600 23,100 33 199 15 26 23,100 0 0 83,500 548,700 44 1,774,800 Bonneville Basin: Bonneville Unit 187,000 30,000 99,000 150 80 960 135 1,290 10 120 27 330 0 13 262,200 5 62 27 600 7,800 25,000 0 7,000 19 62 25 14 7,000 34,800 6,100 400,000 0 0 0 Ute Indian Unit Basin Totals PROJECT TOTALS 0 0 226,000 0 0 0 10 120 0 0 0 0 0 17 203,900 4 44 0 0 0 0 _ 0_ 2^, 000 _ 1_ _ 0_ _ 0 _ 0 2.000 0 0 750,000 _ 0_ _ 0 0 325,000 150 80 960 117 1,410 10 120 27 330 0 30 466,100 9 106 27 600 7,800 25,000 0 9,000 20 62 25 14 9,000 34,800 _ 0 1,150,000 0 0 0 409,100 59,100 362,600 184 122 1460 360 4,320 70 840 88 1,050 47 140 3,509,700 72 155 187 19,300 24,500 28,000 600 32,100 53 261 40 40 32,100 34,800 6,100 1,233,500 548,700 44 1,774,800 With Minimum Ute Indian development: - Uinta Basin: Vernal Unit Bonneville Unit 1,500 26,500 0 0 1,600 0 21 7 1 0 10 0 17 2 210 20 0 15 0 180 3 34 40 410 0 45 0 29 0 780,500 0 16 17 13 4 42 y 10,900 y 8,300 0 3,000 0 600 900 13,400 0 20 15 143 0 5 0 • o 900 13,400 0 0 0 0 3,300 0 12,000 165,900 1 10 33,600 414,000 33,600 33,600 100,800 207,000 822,600 Jensen Unit Upalco Unit Uintah Unit Ute Indian Unit Basin Totals 3,600 42,600 45,200 0 119,400 400 0 7,800 20,900 29,100 18,000 0 1,000 0 20,600 6 0 5/ 5/ 34 4 0 5/ 15. 20 50 0 5/ 180 240 0 12 0 42 73 0 140 0 500 500 0 3 0 0 18 0 40 0 _ 0_ 220 2 4 7 2. 52 10 50 80 20 610 2 0 0 10 57 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 16 4 0 0 _ 0 34 20 2 3 43, 114 500 1,200 1,100 600 14,300 500 800 1,100 600 11,300 0 0 0 0 3,000 0 0 0 0 600 500 1,200 1,100 1,200 18,300 3 4 5 _ l 33 2 7 18 0 185 0 2 0 _ 0 • 7 0 14 12 _ 0 26 500 1,200 1,100 1,200 18,300 0 0 0 _ 0_ 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 40,000 0 2,200 0 45,500 15,000 10,300 30,500 45,000 278,700 1 1 3 _ 5 21 780,500 Bonneville Basin: 0 822,600 Bonneville Unit PROJECT TOTALS 187,000 306,400 30,000 59,100 99,000 119,600 150 184 80 100 960 1200 208 1,620 2,490 10 28 120 340 22 79 330 940 _ 0 57 13 42 262,200 5_ 21 62 96 11 141 600 14,900 7,800 19,100 25,000 28,000 0 600 7.000 25,300 19. 52 62 247 25 32 il 40 7,000 25,300 34,800 34,800 6.100 6,100 400,000 445,500 0 278,700 _ 0 21 1,042,700 1/ The table presents estimated C^ U. P. environmental impacts, using the two extreme plans for the Ute Indian Unit. Development may actually be some combination of the two plans presented. 2/ The area required for tunnel spoil disposal is calculated using an average depth of 30 feet of material for spoil placement. 189 J/ Stream with reduced flows does not include the Lower Duchesne River of the Green or Colorado Rivers. Of these totals for the C. U. P. , including Maximum Ute Indian, an estimated 210 miles ~ For the C. U. P., Including Minimum Ute Indian, an estimated I 89 miles are Class I thru III fisheries. 4/ The Vernal Unit was completed without an inventory of habitat Inundated. 210 57 Drainage requirements for Indian- owned lands will be determined by the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Ute Tribe. Tht totals for the drainage columns would therefore be increased by th The two parts of the table are not additive, are Class I thru III fisheries. ^ amount determined necessary by the aforementioned parties. |