| OCR Text |
Show TABLE OF CONTENTS ( Continued) I. CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION WITH OTHERS ( Continued) 4, Disposition of Comments Received on the Draft Environmental Statement ( Continued) Issue No, Issue 16. The proposed peaking power operation of the Diamond Fork Power System would create a serious safety hazard and cause substantial erosion problems, and siltation of Hayes Reservoir 669 17. Recommendation that Unit construction be delayed until sufficient studies have been made to enable prediction of environmental impacts with complete accuracy 670 18. Recommendation that all construction of the Bonneville Unit and the Central Utah Project be terminated because water reclamation projects in the West are no longer necessary „ 671 19. The Draft Environmental Statement failed to treat reservoir fisheries and stream fisheries as separate entities ............ 672 20. The Draft Environmental Statement did not present an objective analysis of the relationship of costs and benefits which demonstrate that the Unit would be economically justified ...„<>. „ . . 673 21. Construction of the Bonneville Unit to develop part of Utah's legal entitlement to Colorado River water is not a legitimate goal. The estimated magnitude of the entitlement and the portions already used, committed, and uncommitted were not substantiated 673 22. The Draft Environmental Statement did not provide a full disclosure of the environmental impacts of the proposed Unit plan, particularly those that would be considered adverse ...... 674 ix |
