OCR Text |
Show Table C- 4 Effect of Strawberry Aqueduct Fishery Bypasses on Recommended Fishery Requirements ( Annual bypasses are based upon monthly flows) U. S. Forest Service State Division of Wildlif e Resources Stream U Recommended Bypass Fishery Require, ( cfs) ( af/ yr.) Met by Spills & Irrigation Bypasses ( af/ yr.) Project Releases for Fish ( af/ yr.) Unsatisfied Fishery Requirement 1/ ( af/ yr.) Recommended Bypass Fishery Require, ( cfs) ( af/ yr.) Met by Spills & Irrigation Bypasses ( af/ yr.) Project Releases for Fish ( af/ yr.) Unsatisfied Fishery Requirements 1/ ( af/ yr.) Rock Creek 20 14,300 3,600 3,500 7,200 25 18,100 4,300 3,500 10,300 Wolf Creek 3 2,400 0 0 2,400 - - - - - West Fork Duchesne River 8 5,900 1,100 0 4,800 8 5,900 1,100 0 4,800 Currant Creek 5 3,700 300 0 3,400 6 4,300 400 0 3,900 Strawberry River 36 - - - - 12 51 8,700 400 3,000 5,300 Total 26,300 5,000 3,500 17,800 37,000 6,200 6,500 24,300 \ J These figures are only valid for locations imnediately below points of diversion of impoundment and cannot be applied to downstream locations receiving water from seepages, accretion flows and return flows. 2/ No fishery bypasses were requested for South Fork Rock Creek, Hades Creek, Twin Creek, Layout Creek or Water Hollow Creek. |