OCR Text |
Show TABLE OF CONTENTS ( Continued) Page H. ALTERNATIVES TO PROPOSED ACTION ( Continued) 3. Partial Construction of the Proposed Plan ( Continued) c. Proposed Plan with Recommended Minimum Fishery Flows , •• 564 d. Proposed Plan with Nondevelopment of Provo Bay and Recommended Minimum Fishery Flows 567 e. Proposed Plan with Nondevelopment of Utah Lake and Recommended Minimum Fishery Flows .... 569 4. Alternative Plans and Features of Proposed Plan 576 a. Collection System 576 b. Delivery System for Imports from Colorado River Basin „ 588 c. Indian Fishery Mitigation Features 623 d. Bonneville Basin Municipal and Industrial Distribution System „ 624 5. Modifications to Provide Recommended Streamflows .... 627a I. CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION WITH OTHERS 628 1. Consultation and Coordination During Development of the Proposal and During Preparation of the Draft Environmental Statement 628 2. Coordination During Review of the Draft Environmental Statement 630 3. Summary of Public Hearing 634 a. Legal 0 . . 635 b. Social and Economic Factors 636 c. Geologic Data 637 d. Fish and Wildlife 637 e. Recreation • . . 638 f. Esthetics 639 g. Water Quality and Supply 639 h. Power „ 640 i. Alternatives „..„... 641 4. Disposition of Comments Received on the Draft Environmental Statement 641 Issue No. Issue 1. The Bonneville Unit was planned without the benefit of adequate baseline and diagnostic ecological studies necessary to properly assess environmental impacts ........ « , „ . 642 2„ The Draft Environmental Statement failed to adequately evaluate the geologic hazards associated with the construction and operation of the Bonneville Unit 644 vi |