| OCR Text |
Show G/lpportionment ^BoardTT IS not an easy matter at best to apportion money to several organizations, and when each of the organizations is carrying on activities of a nature entirely different from those of the others the task becomes doubly hard. The Apportionment Board of the University has fulfilled these tasks admirably, even with all the confusion that has been created by the Union Building Fund Drive.The task of the Apportionment is anything but an easy one. Each activitiy seems to desire an increased appropriation every year. Of course, with the state appropriation not being materially increased, it is difficult to satisfy all these activities. There are some who think that their quota should be increased, while others are fairly well satisfied with the action of the Board. It is a difficult task for the members of the Board to decide just whichof the activities require more money and which can get along with less. Because all student activities are taken into consideration the personnel of the Board should be such that nearly all branches of campus ife are represented.The work of the Board during the past year has been quite satisfactory, particularly in view of the fact that the Stadium and the Union Building have lessened the appropriation for campus activities.The members of this board are as follows: Professor Levi Edgar Young, chairman; Frederick J. Pack, faculty representative; Paul Iverson, student representative; Paul Cecil, student representative; Frank Jonas, president of the A. S. U. U.; Joseph Jeppson, treasurer of the A. S. U. U.j Thomas Hull, bursar of the University.YOUNGPACKHULLJONASIVERSONJEPPSONPage 36 |
