OCR Text |
Show Final Report Hydrologic Model Analysis of the Provo River Basin 2.0 CONDUCT OF THE STUDY, DEVELOPMENT OF THE MODEL, AND THE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS This Hydrologic Model Analysis of the Provo River Basin was initiated in January 1992, with the development of a conceptual model study. During this phase, a Technical Advisory Committee ( TAC) was formed to provide public involvement and technical guidance. The TAC was involved during each of the remaining phases of the project, including analysis of Provo River hydrology and water rights, analysis of Weber River hydrology and water rights, and software development and calibration. Each of these phases is described in the following subsections. 2.1 Conceptual Model Development The first step in conducting the Hydrologic Model Analysis of the Provo River Basin was the development of a conceptual format for the resultant computer model. This formulation step included the collection of basic data on the physical and institutional setting of the system, the formation of a public involvement program ( described in section 2.2), and the development of objectives, limitations, and specifications for the computer software. The conceptual model development phase was concluded with the preparation of a revised draft Technical Memorandum # 1 - Conceptual Model Development ( CUWCD, 1992a). 2.1.1 Data Collection The data collection effort was an important step in developing the conceptual model of the system. Relevant, historical data were obtained, reviewed, and processed into a digitized database. This included streamflows, meteorology, land use, irrigation and M& I diversions, reservoir storage( s), and water demands. Related previous studies were obtained and reviewed. Interviews were conducted with technical experts in the field of water rights and hydrologic modeling and with water resources managers from the area. 2.1.2 Development of Objectives, Limitations, and Specifications As the result of the conceptual model development phase, the following objectives were delineated: • To develop a better understanding of the Provo River system hydrology and water rights. • To permit more efficient utilization of water among competing uses and users. January 1998 Page 9 |