OCR Text |
Show 228 THE DESCENT OF lVLA.N. species" mio-ht here be used with much propriety. But from long habit the term "race" wil.l perhaps alw~ys be employed. The choice of terms IS only so far Important as it is highly desirable to use, as far as that may be possible, the same terms for the same d~grees of difference. Unfortunately this is rarely possible; for within the same family the larger gener~ ?ene.rally include closely-allied forms, which can be chstmgmshed only with much difficulty, whilst. t?e smaller genera include forms that are perfectly d1stmct; yet all m~st equally be ranked as species. So again the speCies within the same large genus by no means resemb~e each other to the same degree: on the contrary, m most cases some of them can be arranged in little groups round other species, like satellites round planets.19 The question whether mankind consists o~ one orseveral species has of late years been much agitated by anthropologists, who are divided into two schools ?f monogenists and polygenists. Those who do not adm1t the principle of evolution, must look at species either as separate creations or as in some manner distinct entities; and they must decide what forms to rank a& species by the analogy of other organic beings which are commonly thus received. But it is a hopeless endeavour to decide this point on sound grounds, until some definition of the term "species" is generally accepted ; and the definition must not include an element which cannot possibly be . ascertained, such as an act of creation. We might as well attempt without any definition to decide whether a certain number of houses should be called a village, or town, or city. We have a. practical illustration of the difficulty in the never- 1g 'Origin of Specieo,' 5th edit. p. Gf. CHAP. VII. THE RACES OF MAN. 229 ending doubts whether many closely-allied mammals, birds, insects, and plants, which represent each other in North America and Europe, should be ranked species or geographical races; and so it is with the productions of many islands situated at some little distance from the nearest continent. Those naturalists, on the other hand, who admit the principle of evolution, and this is now admitted by the greater number of rising men, will feel no doubt that all the races of man are descended from a single primitive stock; whether or not they think fit to designate them as distinct species, for the sake of expressing their amount of difference.20 With our domestic animals the question whether the various races have arisen from one or more species is different. Although all such races, as well as all the natural species within the same genus, have undoubtedly sprung from the same primitive stock, yet it is a fit subject for discussion, whether, for instance, all the domestic races of the dog have acquired their present differences since some one species was first domesticated and bred by man; or whether they <nve some of their characters to inheritance from distinct species, which had already been modified in a state of nature. With mankind no such question can arise, for he cannot be said to have been domesticated at any particular period. vVhen the races of man diverged. at an extremely remote epoch from their common progenitor, they will have differed but. little from each other, and been few in number; consequently they will then, as far as their distinguishing characters are concerned, have bad less claim to rank as distinct species, than the existing so- .:~o See Prof. H1L~ey to this effect in .the 'Fortnightly Review,' 1865, JP. 275.. |