OCR Text |
Show 164 THE DESCENT OF MAN. PART I. first impulse to benevolent actions. Habits, moreover, followed during many generations probably tend to be inherited. But there is another and much more powerful stimulus to the development of the social virtues, namely, the praise and the blame of our feUow-men. The love of approbation and the dread of infamy, as 'veil as the bestowal of praise or blame, are primarily due, as we have seen in the third chapter, to the instinct of sympathy; and this instinct no doubt was originally acquired, like all the other social instincts, through natural seleetion. 'At how early a period the progenitors of man, in the course of their development, became capable of feeling and being impelled by the praise or blame of their fellow-creatures, we cannot, of course, say. But it appears that even dogs appreciate encouragement, praise, and. blame. The 1·udest savages feel the sentiment of glory, as they clearly show by preserving the trophies of their prowess, by their habit of excessive boasting, and even by the extreme care which they take of their personal appearance and decorations ; for unless they regarded the o'pinion of their comrades, such habits would be senseless. They certainly feel shame at the breach of some of their lesser rules; but how far they experience remorse is doubtful. I was at first surprised that I could not recollect any recorded instances of this feeling in savages; and Sir J. Lubbock 6 states that he knows of none. But if we banish from our minds all cases given in novels and plays and in death-bed confessions made to priests, I doubt whether many of us have actually witnessed remorse; though we may haye often seen shame and contrition for smaller offences. Remorse is 6 ' Ori gin of Ci viliEation,' 1 870, p. 2G5: CnAr. V. MORAL FACULTIES. 165 a deeply hidden feeling. It is incredible that a savage, who will sacrifice his life rather than betray his tribe, or one who will deliver himself up as a prisoner rather than break his parole, 7 would not feel remorse in his inmost soul, though he might conceal it, if he had failed in a duty which he held sacred. We may therefore conclude that primeval man, at a very remote period, would have been influenced by the praise and blame of his fellows. It is obvious, that the members of the same tribe would approve of conduct which appeared to them to be for the general good, and would reprobate that which appeared evil. To do good unto others-to do unto others as ye would they should do unto you,-is the foundation-stone of morality. It is, the1·efore, hardly possible to exaggerate the importance during rude times of the love of praise and the dread of blame. A man who was not impelled by any deep, instinctive feeling, to sacrifice his life· for the good of others, yet was roused to such actions by a sense of glory, would by his example excite the same wish for glory in other men, and would strengthen by exercise the noble feeling of admiration. He might thus do far more good to his tribe than by begetting offspring with a tendency to inherit his own high character . .) With increased experience and reason, man perceives the more remote consequences of his actions, and the self-regarding virtues, such as temperance, chastity, &c., ·which during early times are, as we have before seen, utterly disregarded, come to be highly esteemed or eveu held sacred. I need not, however, repeat what I have said on this head in the third chapter. Ultimately a highly complex sentiment, having its first origin in the 7 Mr. Wallace gives cases in his 'Contributions to the Theory of Natural Selection,' 1870, p. 354. |