OCR Text |
Show SUMMARY (Continued) region. These modified projections are designated as the regionally inter- preted OBERS projections (RI OBERS) and are the basis for the framework plan. This plan is described in detail, then is followed by alternative plans that reflect emphasis on different uses for the available water sup- plies and. resources. The alternative plans are identified as: 1. States' alternative to the framework plan (6.55 million acre-foot) level of development, 2. States' alternative at the 8.16 million acre-foot level of development, and 3- States' alternative for water supply physically available at site in the region (9.hk million acre-feet). Comparisons of the framework plan and alternate levels of development are shown in the table on the following page. Program costs borne by the Federal Government for the framework plan would total about $3 billion for the 55 years for installation; annual OM&R (operation, maintenance, and replacement) costs would increase to about $48 million by 2020. Non-Federal entity costs would total $10 bil- lion for installation by 2020, with OM&R costs increasing to over $6k6 million annually, particularly for thermal-electric power and recreation. Time frame Water development Associated development Total development Installation cost in $1,000 1966-1980 1981-2000 2001-2020 1,190,300 1,07^,350 658,780 2,700,840 5,982,310 1,397,680 3,891,1^0 7,056,660 2,056,460 1966-2020 2,923,^30 10,080,830 13,004,260 All proposed levels of development meet the requirements of OBERS projections and use the available resources of the region in varying de- grees. It appears that the commitments of the Colorado River Compact can be met, and except for local shortages during low streamflows, on-site demands can be met for the 6.55 MAF development level. At the two higher levels, augmentation will be required. Land and mineral resources exist in sufficient quantity to meet all projected levels of development. With minor exceptions, hunting and fish- ing needs -will be met. ii |