| OCR Text |
Show U ni tarianism in Utah sin And then I corruption. or thought, if I cannot depend depend upon? If my reason upon my reason, what shall I kept me in the church, its conclusions would be counted safe but that it is leading me away, it is condemned. Whether I continued to preach according to this awful theory of a lost and partially redeemed race, or rejected the theory and stopped preaching, I must follow this same guide, my common sense. and valid Most enough, repugnant atonement, as it is died for sinners, suffered in their the ends of own with all to common sense is implied in revivals. Christ told, paid the debt they owed, are we nor the doctrine of the and preached and stead. room neither reasonable his now This, if true, would be It would not be right. justice would be defeated. Each debts and suffer for his good men, own sins. right man because should pay Jesus, doubtless, suffered somewhat because others did wrong. We all do that. Every dishonest man makes many But for a sinner to accept such a vicarious others suffer. sacrifice a God some in order to win heaven is to deserve hell. plan to of there is us. no such man eats his as is unbelievable "I would rather Plutarch, than own children." - at And for least for should say is one there say Plutarch wrote this men to theology, the myth of Saturn or mind, but curiously enough it applies theology of today. Better say there is the old Roman against Chronus well injustice Plutarch said: Plutarch who as such being to in his the revival God, than say there is a God who slew his son because men had sinned. The doctrine of purchased forgiveness no crucified Savior would be wrong if true. But it is unreasonable in its very nature. We could imagine that Jesus through 180 a might have suffered or may have suffered for Peter and James and John. They may have plotted against the Roman tyranny, and Judas may have betrayed the plot, and Jesus may have |
