| OCR Text |
Show 5.5 Summary Results for Optimal Solution - Oneida & Amalga . . . . 131 5.6 Optimization Model Results: Reservoirs in Parallel - Millcreek and Avon 134 5.7 Summary Results for Optimal Solution - Millcreek & Avon . . . . 135 5.8 Optimization Model Results - 7 Reservoirs Lower Bear River System 136 5.9 Summary Results for Optimal Solution - 7 Reservoir Lower Bear River System 138 5.10 Parameter Values for Jordan River Applications 146 5.11 Optimal Solution - Jordan River System - Demand = 20,000 Ac- ft 146 5.12 Optimal Solution - Jordan River System - Demand = 40,000 Ac- ft 147 5.13 Optimal Solution - Jordan River System - Demand = 60,000 Ac- ft . 147 5.14 Optimal Solution - Jordan River System - Demand = 80,000 Ac- ft 148 5.15 Optimal Solution - Jordan River System - Demand = 100,000 Ac- ft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148 5.16 Optimal Solution - Jordan River System - Demand = 110,000 Ac- ft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 5.17 Optimal Solution - Jordan River System - Demand = 120,000 Ac- ft 149 7.1 Optimal Solution - Jordan River System - Demand = 20,000 Ac- ft/ yr 167 7.2 Optimal Solution - Jordan River System - Demand = 40,000 Ac- ft/ yr 167 7.3 Optimal Solution - Jordan River System - Demand = 60,000 Ac- ft/ yr 168 7.4 Optimal Solution - Jordan River System - Demand = 80,000 Ac- ft/ yr 168 7.5 Optimal Solution - Jordan River System - Demand = 110,000 Ac- ft/ yr 169 7.6 Optimal Solution - Jordan River System - Demand = 120,000 Ac- ft/ yr 169 7.7 Optimal Solution - Jordan River System - Demand = 140,000 Ac- ft/ yr 170 7.8 Optimal Solution - Jordan River System - Demand = 60,000 Ac- ft/ yr 173 7.9 Optimal Solution - Jordan River System - Demand = 120,000 Ac- ft/ yr . 174 viii |
