| OCR Text |
Show CALIFORNIA DEFENDANTS | Exhibit No. 5572 Identification: Aug. 22, 1958 Admitted:.................... Tr. 21,834 DISPOSITION OF COLORADO RIVER MAIN STREAM WATER SUPPLIES BY VARIOUS STUDIES MEXICAN TREATY OBLIGATION ON UPPER BASIN i*£g^PROPO£E&* BY ARIZONA LEGEND FOR PIE CHARTS M = ARRIVING AT MEXICAN BORDER LB = AVAILABLE TO LOWER BASIN FROM MAIN STREAM UB = UPPER BASIN DEPLETION AT LEE FERRY y V^' CONTRIBUTION BY UPPER ^" BASIN AT LEE FERRY FOR MEXICAN TREATY OBLIGATION STETSON STUDY 25,000,000 EFFECTIVE UPPER BASIN STORAGE ERICKSON STUDY (I-A) 25,000,000 EFFECTIVE UPPER BASIN STORAGE ERICKSON STUDY 35,000,000 EFFECTIVE UPPER BASIN STORAGE (W/0 MEX. TR. OBLIG. ON UPPER BASIN) STETSON STUDY 52,000,000 EFFECTIVE UPPER BASIN STORAGE STETSON STUDY 52,000,000 EFFECTIVE UPPER BASIN STORAGE MODIFIED BY ERICKSON LOSSES ERICKSON STUDY (2-A) 43,000,000 EFFECTIVE UPPER BASIN STORAGE ERICKSON STUDY (I-B) 25,000,000 EFFECTIVE UPPER BASIN STORAGE ERICKSON STUDY (OPT.-B) 35,000,000 EFFECTIVE UPPER BASIN STORAGE ERICKSON STUDY (£-B) 45,000,000 EFFECTIVE UPPER BASIN STORAGE TOTALS IN MILLIONS OF ACRE-FEET UPPER BASIN DEPLETION AVAILABLE TO LOWER BASIN FROM MAIN STREAM I ARRIVING AT MEXICAN BOUNDARY |
| Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |
