OCR Text |
Show CALIFORNIA DEFENDANTS Exhibit No. 5203 Identification: Aug. 14,1958 Admitted: Aug. 14,1958 Tr. 20,531 Tr. 20,577 EXTRACT FROM SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT, UPPER COLORADO RIVER COMMISSION (APRIL 1, 1955), APPENDIX C: "PRESENT AND FUTURE QUALITY OF COLORADO RIVER WATER AT LEES FERRY," BY TOHN H. BLISS, TABLE III, PAGE 42, AS CITED BY ARIZONA WITNESS ERICKSON IN SUPPORT OF ARIZONA EXHIBIT 372; WITH THREE COLUMNS ADDED BY CALIFORNIA WITNESS FIREMAN. TABLE III COMPUTATION OF SALT BALANCE IN ELEPHANT BUTTE RESERVOIR -Jan. 1,1933 to Jan. 1,1947 (Values in Thousands) TONS In Storage 1-1-31* 1931 Inflow-R.G. at San Marcial 1932 Inflow-R.G. at San Marcial 1931 Outflow 1932 Outflow In Storage 1-1-33 1933-46 Inflows-R.G. at San Marcial Total Into Res., 1933-46 1945_46 Av.-R.G. at San Marcial 1946-R.G. below E.B. Res. Salt Concentrations (Av. of above) In Storage 1-1-47 1933-46 Outflows-R.G. below E.B. Res. Total out of Res., 1933-46 Excess of Inflows over Outflows % of Total Inflow** End of Yr. Ca Mg Na/K HCO, SO* Cl T.D.S. Storage A 17 136 30 171 299 396 116 1046 rv. r. 1273 68 15 92 143 219 62 549 139 31 170 312 396 116 821 81 15 103 99 238 59 617 924 81 20 107 97 262 59 659 CALCULATION BY DR. FIREMAN 181 1168 41 241 223 1319 558 1456 511 3094 176 794 1140 9030 Sum of Sum of Percent Cations Anions Error (Te) (Te) 16.5 16.5 0 8.6 8.6 0 16.7 16.7 0 9.7 8.2 + 18.3 10.2 8.7 + 17.2 21.9 24.8 -11.7 1395 1349 282 1542 2014 3605 976f 10170 .080T/AF .015T/AF .080T/AF .112T/AF .178T/AF .O47T/AF .562T/AF .084T/AF .018T/AF .099T/AF .120T/AF .2O5T/AF .067T/AF .644T/AF .082T/AF .017T/AF .090T/AF .116T/AF .192T/AF .O57T/AF .603T/AF 65 13 71 92 151 45 476 789 1077 228 1278 1357 2940 820 8388 1142 241 1349 1449 3091 865 8864 207 41 193 565 514 105 1306 15.3% 14.5% 12.5% 28.0% 14.3% 10.8% 12.8% 134.4 110.7 +21.4 156.3 135.6 +15.3 7.4 5.9 +25.4 127.0 106.6 +19.1 134.4 112.5 +19.5 21.9 22.9 -4.4 Average 12.7 Note: All values recorded excepting those for 1929-1932 which were estimated from correlation curves based on discharge. * Average of concentrations of dissolved constituents for years 1929 and 1930. ** Equals percent loss of various constituents from solution in reservoir basin. tCounsel's Note: Figure of 976 should be 970. Error is in the Colorado River Compact Commission Report. |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |