OCR Text |
Show Coachella (P.K.) 3 Table 1, Calif. Ex. 318 4 Table 2, Calif. Ex. 318 5 Project Records 6 Project Records 7 (6)-(5) 8 Item 81, Calif. Ex. 275, = 595 49.4 9 Item 10, Table 4, Calif. Ex. 318, = 52.1 49.4 10 For Year 1955 Diversions to C. @ P.K. 595.0 Item 81, Calif. Ex. 275 Net loss P.K. to Drop 1 143 it 73, Chargeable to IID 120 82, Chargeable to C. 23 - 23.0 Diversion to C. @ Drop 1 572.0 " 77, Diversion @ Check 6-A -390.4 " 4, Table 4, Cal. Ex. 181.6 No. 318 Loss P.K. to Check 6-A 204.6 Unlined Canal Loss 24.7 u 7, Settling loss 30.5 11, Equalizing loss 3.4 12, Handling loss 8.9 13, Loss 6-A to end 67.5 67.5 272.1 (10) = 272.1 49.4 11 (9)+ (10) 12 (ll)-5-(8) 13 Item 14, Table 4, Calif. Ex. 318, = 270.8 49.4 14 (13)-^(8) 15 Table 2, Calif. Ex. 318 (excludes leaching water) 16 17 (15)+ (8) i/ 18 (17)h-(13) Palo Verde 3 Tr. 8772, Valley 89, Mesa 16 total ! 105 Acres 4 Col. 3, Calif. Ex. 355 5 Calif. Ex. 356 for 1955 6 Negligible 7 (6)+ (5) 8 Col. 5, Calif. Ex. 355 9-14 Insufficient data 15 Calif. Ex. 356 (includes leaching) 17 Insufficient data 18 Insufficient data |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |