OCR Text |
Show 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. Total Dissolved Solids* Average Estimated Future Annual Flow Conditions (1000 Acre-Feet) (1) (Tons/AF) (1000 Tons) (2) (3) Outflow- Lake Mead 9,197(k) 1.25 ll,474(m) Evaporation- Hoover Dam to Imperial Dam (o) -300 Usable flow from Bill Wil- liams River (o) + 75 Natural river losses-Hoover Dam to International Boundary (o) -600 Salvage of river losses (o) + 300 Consumptive Use-Colorado River Indian Reservation (p) -329 Consumptive Use-Palo Verde Irrigation District (r) -266 At Imperial Dam (s) 8,077** 1.42** 11,474 *For Colorado River water the weight of the "total dissolved solids" is approximately 85% of the weight of the total soluble salts at Grand Canyon, and 89% at Yuma. **Includes water available for diversion by Metropolitan Water District from Lake Havasu. Such diversion would have the effect of slightly increasing the tons per acre-foot at Imperial Dam. (a) From Ariz. Ex. 372. (b) Line 1 minus lines 2a and 2b. (c) Sum of lines 3 and 4. (d) Seven percent of line 5, based on C. S. Howard, Lake Mead Comprehensive Survey of 1948-49. (e) Line 5 minus line 6. (f) Line 5 minus line 7. (g) Line 8 plus line 9. (h) Seven percent of line 9. (j) Seventy-five percent of present rate of solution, based on C. S. Howard, Lake Mead Comprehensive Survey of 1948-49. (k) Line 10 minus line 11. (m) Line 10 minus line 12 plus line 13. (o) From Ariz. Ex. 366. (p) Future uses; from United States Answer to California Interrogatory O-3, dated August 2, 1957. Only the United States claim for the portion of the reservation in Arizona is included. (r) Present uses; from Ariz. Ex. 429. Future uses are estimated as 317,-000 acre-feet per annum in Calif. Ex. 277. (s) Line 14 plus lines 16 and 18, and minus lines 15, 17, 19, and 20. |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |