| OCR Text |
Show CALIFORNIA DEFENDANTS Exhibit No. 5201 Identification: Aug. 14,1958 Admitted: Aug. 14, 1958 Tr, 20,531 Tr. 20,577 QUALITY OF WATER COLORADO RIVER FUTURE CONDITIONS BASED ON 1909-1956 WATER SUPPLY (Revision of calculations and figures in Ariz. Ex. 372-Erickson) Average Annual Flow (1000 Acre-Feet) (1) 1. Green, Colorado and San Juan Rivers (a) 12,632 2. Effects of estimated future upstream depletions a. Transbasin diversions (a) -1,350 b. Other diversions (a) -2,650 3. Future Green, Colorado and San Juan Rivers (b) 8,632 4. Net gain to Lee Ferry (a) 615 5. Net inflow to Glen Canyon Reservoir (c) 9,247 6. Evaporation- Glen Canyon (a) -500 7. Precipitation of dissolved solids -Glen Canyon (d) 8. Lee Ferry 8,747(e) 9. Net gain to Hoover Dam (a) 950 10. Net into Lake Mead (g) 9,697 11. Evaporation- Lake Mead (a) -500 12. Precipitation of dissolved solids -Lake Mead 13. Salts into solution-Lake Mead Total Dissolved Solids* Estimated Future _____Conditions_____ (Tons/AF) (1000 Tons) (2) 0.68 1.02 1.00 1.74 1.07 (3) 8,590 0.08 -110 0 0 0.98 8,480 1.54 947 9,427 -660 8,767(1) 1,653 10,420 |
| Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |
