OCR Text |
Show LEEDS, HILL AND JEWETT Future Salt Burden of Colorado River. 8-15-58 -11- TABLE D AVERAGE SALT BURDEN OF COLORADO RIVER UNDER PRESENT CONDITIONS PER ERICKSON _______(Revision of Plaintiff's Exhibit 372)_______ Average Annual Flow Dissolved 1000 Solids Tons _ Acre Feet 1000 Tons A/F 1. Green, Colorado, and San Juan Rivers 2. Future Upstream Depletion 3. Present Green, Colorado and San Juan Rivers 4. Net Gain to Lee Ferry 5. Net Inflow to Glen Canyon Reservoir (under construction) 6. Evaporation - Glen Canyon 7. Precipitation of Dissolved Solids - Glen Canyon 8. Lee Ferry 9. Net Gain to Hoover Dam 10. Net into Lake Mead 11. Evaporation - Lake Mead 12. Precipitation of Dissolved Solids - Lake Mead (7%) - -783 13. Salts into Solution (Lake Mead) 390 - 1,560 0.25 14. Outflow - Lake Mead 13,697 11,967 0.87 12,632 8, 590 0.68 0 0 12,632 8,590 0.68 615 947 1.54 13,247 9,537 0.72 0 - 0 13,247 9,537 0.72 950 1,653 1.74 14,197 11, 190 0.79 500 |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |